11月GMAT作文机经：买房or买股票.

　　已经成为GMAT考试的指导，GMAT机经对于各位考生们非常重要。在考试之前，对GMAT真题的复习，是最直接最有利于考生们的复习材料。下面是十一月最近作文机经，希望帮助大家复习。澳际教育在这里将最新的GMAT机经分享给大家，希望帮助考生们认真备考。

　　【原始】作文是说一个城市过去5年房价涨的很快 但是国债却一直贬值，所以那些房产的主人就增加了自己的资产，然后就有人说应该让所有的居民都去投资房子，而且在房产增值的同时还可以用。。

　　【考古】

　　Now is the perfect time to buy a house in our city. Over the past five years, average home prices in our region have nearly doubled. But average stock prices in the national stock market have actually declined over the same period. So homeowners have seen an increase in value for their housing investment during the last five years that far exceeds what they could have made by investing in the stock market. Our city’s residents can surely achieve a similar profit over the nest five years. Futhermre, if residents invest in a home, they can enjoy the use of the home while its value increases, whereas money invested in stocks would not contribute to their quality of life in the same way that owning a home would. Therore, all the residents of our city should invest their money in a home

　　【参考思路】

　　1) All things equal

　　五年前的情况 现在可能变化很大， 股票随着很多因素的改变

　　2) 错误因果关系

　　买房子不一定赚钱，人们买房子的目的，住而不是投资。类比错误4即使投资，房子的价格也没有给出，是不是大家买得起。买股票多少钱都可以投资

　　1) 无根据假设

　　( rich and quality of life)

　　18. 公立医院PK私立医院

　　【原始】作文： 是对比大学校医院 和外面私立医院的 作者的结论是- 大学的医院quality of care 没有其他医院那么好。 作者给出的几个理由是：1，大学的医院profit 比外面医院少20%，大学的医生收入比外面医生收入少15%。 2，说大学医院的医生要把他们的时间分成3份 用来讲课，做research 和治病，所以没有外面医生那么全心治疗。

　　【原题】The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.

　　“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”

　　Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

　　【参考思路】

　　1， 从一个医院的情况就推广到整个太草率

　　2， 治愈率低可能是因为接受的患者得的病都比较罕见等原因造成的

　　3， 工资低，总体利润低，时间分配给教学都不能一定说明质量差。可能其他福利好，接受的病人少，教学研究有助于进步

　　【参考思路】

　　1. 首先，医生的人数与质量之间没有必然的因果原因。profit跟质量也无关系。很可能treating price is significantly lower。

　　2. 成功率不能说明问题。缺乏其他的证据，忽略了他因：比如因为质量高，所以很多serious illness的，而送往其他医院的一般都是common cases.

　　3. 时间不能代表问题。因为那些医生所做的研究很可能帮助他们进行治疗。

　　【参考范文】

　　In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

　　The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the author’s use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.

　　Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.

　　Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.

　　In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.

　　还有更多关于GMAT机经的内容请关注澳际教育，澳际教育将第一时间将最新的GMAT机经分享给大家，同时也希望在考生们利用GMAT机经复习的同时，注重学习方法的总结，考出理想的成绩。