GMAT作文机经整理：足球比赛与经济发展.

　　GMAT作文机经整体来说受换库影响不是很大，但是还是会有一些新题的，考生朋友可以将最近两三个月的GMAT作文机经都拿出来看看，为此澳际小编特收集整理GMAT作文机经分享给大家，希望对大家有所帮助。

　　【考古】11月机经

　　V1：一个B城市,5年前hold a soccer competition. 发现相比在这个competition3年前，在这个competition举办后的3年的number of tourists increased 25%。所以呢,这个B城市打算再举办一次类似的sport event来吸引游客。这个城市B相信，sport event会增加游客人数，同时benit the country economy

　　V2：The country of Bonaria held a major soccer event five years ago. Therore, if the country continues to hold major sport events, tourism will increase rapidly in the country and thus bring benits to the country&aposs economy.

　　【参考思路】

　　1. 错误的由时间先后推出因果关系

　　2. 过去的成功不能保证将来，存在他因

　　3. 因果关系：不能因为一场球赛吸引了很多观众就要举办更多的比赛。首先举办比赛需要场地。足球比赛对场地的要求较低，但如果是举办体操，游泳等比赛，会花费大量的建厂成本，也许会超过收入。

　　4. 论据以偏概全：不能因为一场球赛就说明所有的国际比赛都很吸引观众。也许是因为这场比赛的重要性和特殊性导致了其有很高的观众参与度，就像Olympic game一样。但是其他的国际比赛也许不能有这样的效果。

　　5. Either or 的选择：提高经济收入并不仅仅有通过举办比赛这样一种方式，还可以发展当地的旅游特色，挖掘作为一个island的特点，从而增加收入

　　【参考范文】

　　这篇是网友作文作品，还请大家谨慎参考，不能保证质量

　　The conclusion endorsed in the given argument is that tourism will increase rapidly in Bonaria and thus bring benits to Bonaria’s economy if the country continues to hold major sport events. A major reason is offered in support of this argument, the author points out that after the soccer event that was held 5 years ago, the number of tourists to Bonaria has increased by 25% in the last 3 years. At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be plausible, but close scrutiny reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion.

　　To begin with，the author is committed a fallacy of “after this, therore, because of this ”. The line of reasoning is that because the major soccer event was held bore the increment of Bonaria’s tourists, the former caused the latter. However, this reasoning is fallacious unless other possible causal factors have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps the increment of tourists is resulted from a newly opened national park of Bonaria

　　, or a substantial reduction of cost to visit Bonaria might be the direct reason. Without thorough analysis of the real cause of the increment of tourist, it would be groundless to attribute it to the soccer event held 5 years ago.

　　Secondly, even if the soccer event indeed caused the increment of tourist in the past 3 years, the author still unfairly infers that the prosperity of tourism will continue to develop by hold more sport events, which might not be soccer event. The author relies on a gratuitous assumption that soccer event is representative of all sport events, in general. Since soccer, the so called “Man’s game”, is the most popular sport all around the world, it’s hasty to say that other sport events can have the same stimulating fect on the tourism of Bonaria. So unless it can be shown that the sport events which Bonaria is planed to hold in the future are also fashionable enough to attract tourists, the conclusion that the tourism will grow rapidly as a result of more held sport events in Bonaria is fairly unwarranted.

　　The last but not least, the author assumes that rapid grow in tourism will thus brings great benits to the country’s economy. As we know, profit is factor of both revenue and cost, this assumption fails to take into account for cost increases and inficiency results from the quickly growing number of tourists. To evaluate the argument, whether the revenue of the newly held sport events can weigh against the sport events’ total cost, which is not only from the construction of new stadiums but also from the sanitation problems, is must be taken into account. The trivial organizations of so much sport events will also increase the cost. In short, this assumption is highly suspect unless it could be supported with a thorough cost-benit analysis.

　　To conclude, this argument is unwarranted as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that the tourism will increase rapidly in the country and thus bring benits to the country’s economy if Bonaria hold more sport events in the future. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author should provide more evidences to demonstrate that 1) The 25% increased proportion of the number of tourists in Bonaria is caused by the major soccer event that held 5 years ago; 2) The planed sport events can attract tourists as fective as soccer do; 3) The revenue of the newly held sport events in the future could weigh against the total cost. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than a just an wishful thinking.

　　以上就是2月份的GMAT作文机经部分，考生朋友可以根据文中的意思自己选择性练习，看自己拿到题目后是否会做，最后祝大家都能考出好成绩。