2017年4月逻辑机经（七）.

　　44、开发新能源

　　V1(from controllee)某公司要开发新能源，要在水下打很多深井，第二天市政府就可以通过开工了，问削弱。有两个选项比较彷徨，我选的是该城市以前没有过打井成功的经验。

　　45、潜水者

　　V1(from chihhsin7337)700+初学者还游客，是没有潜水经验的人。而职业潜水人，都是有证照及多年经验的。但是在recreational diving中出事的，职业潜水人的人数不比游客少(还是两者一样多)，所以说，一定职业潜水人一定忽略了某些安全上的点。问weaken这个推论。

　　我选 从事recreational diving的人中，职业潜水人占了很大比例。

　　46、网上订票

　　V1(from chihhsin7337)700+ABC airline的老闆決定用在airline的website上推出票價discount，鼓厲大家直接上他們的website去訂票，而不要去那種比價的website，website都會列出多家airlines票價的. 求weaken

　　選 在那種比價的website上，ABC airline的票價就是最便宜的了。

　　47、两座桥

　　V1(from raistlin422)720有一题是strengthen：讲某国有两座桥，N和W，N要repair，于是只能走W。这个国家觉得过路费收的比原来少了，于是要在W桥上比原来基础上多收20%的费用。原文说此举不会影响到驾车人的选择，问strengthen。我选的是“开车的对这点涨价没所谓。”

　　考古

　　V1填空题：一个城市的居民要么用南桥要么用北桥，南桥要修复，市长准备在修复期间免南桥过桥费，为了不大幅度减少政府的过桥费收入，市长提议将北桥的过桥费增加，市长说这个提议会达到效果因为——选了一个人们在桥之间的转换不方便

　　V2一个填空题前面没细看，是说最近过桥费下降了，最低25什么的，还有个30%，所以要提高Revenue,要提高过桥费，但是过这个桥的人并不会减少，给了一个原因，加了个and，填后面的。人们如果在桥之间转换会导致非常大的不便。

　　V3说一个地方有两个桥 NORTH SOUTH NORTH 要维修，所以过桥费少收25%

　　为了弥补这个损失SOUTH 的就多收了20%

　　问假设 答案就选哪个能保证SOUTH 通行量的 就是加了钱 也不会有车不走哪桥，确定

　　V4一个地方有两个桥貌似叫north-bridge and south-bridge. 北桥要大修，同时不收过桥费了(toll这个词);另一方面政府不想因为这个不收费了，降低总体收入，因此南桥的toll要涨价。问support吧也可能是assumption. 只记得俩选项：1，北桥修理，南桥车流量增大。2，南桥多的钱可以弥补北桥修桥的损失。

　　V5南桥北桥这道，题干正确，答案中两个我比较不确定，一个是北桥的收费直接补充到南桥的维修上，一个是因为换桥走特别不方便，人们轻易不会换桥走。犹豫了一会，我最后还是选了第二个，其它选项都不是很相关。

　　V6到一个地方上班，必须经过两个侨中的一个。其中一个要返修，政府决定停止收费。但为了保证总的费用不变，要增加另外一个桥的TOLL。政府知道更多的人要使用后面的桥，问什么可以使政府的计划成功。选大家都不会改变使用的TOLL,否则会很麻烦

　　V7南北两个桥，南桥在修理，所以政府决定不收过路费，而为了避免overall revenue的损失，在北桥提高收费标准by 20cent。问评价政府能否达到目的的条件吧。 我选的是那些原来过北桥的人不会因为提高收费就不走了。

　　V8从一个地方到另一个地方只能通过N桥或者S桥，N桥最近要重修，因此收费站不能再使用，为了避免总收入降低，就让S桥收费站涨价，加强为何该措施能成功，选了人们如果在桥之间转换会导致非常大的不便。

　　48、利润哪儿来的?

　　V1(from audrey1007)700有一个公司从某东东中获得的利润大幅上升，一部分原因是公司逐步提高这个东东的price, 但是仅仅从price中获利无法account the total revenue increase, 问explaination~

　　49、GWD 黑脸题

　　V1(from 乔小桥)

　　Ecologists: the Scottish Highlands were once the site of extensive forests, but these forests have mostly disappeared and been replaced by peat bogs. The common view is that the Highland’s dorestation was caused by human activity, especially agriculture. However, agriculture began in the Highlands less than 2,000 years ago. Peat bogs, which consist of compressed decayed vegetable matter, build up by only about one foot per 1000 years, and, throughout the Highlands, remains of trees in peat bogs are almost all at depth great than four feet. Since climate changes that occurred between 7,000 years and 4,000 years ago favored the development of peat bogs rather than the survival of forests, the dorestation was more likely the result of natural processes than of human activity.

　　In the ecologist’s argument, the two portions in boldfaces play which of the following roles?

　　The first is evidence that has been used in support of a position that the argument rejects; the second is a finding that the ecologist uses to counter the evidence.

　　The first is evidence that, in light of the evidence provided in the second, serves as grounds for the ecologist’s rejection of a certain position

　　The first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is evidence that has been used in support of that position.

　　The first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second provides evidence in support of that rejection.

　　The first is a position for which the ecologist argues; the second provides evidence to support that position.

　　我碰到的是：

　　Ecologists: the Scottish Highlands were once the site of extensive forests, but these forests have mostly disappeared and been replaced by peat bogs. The common view is that the Highland’s dorestation was caused by human activity, especially agriculture. However, agriculture began in the Highlands less than 2,000 years ago. Peat bogs, which consist of compressed decayed vegetable matter, build up by only about one foot per 1000 years, and, throughout the Highlands, remains of trees in peat bogs are almost all at depth great than four feet. Since climate changes that occurred between 7,000 years and 4,000 years ago favored the development of peat bogs rather than the survival of forests, the dorestation was more likely the result of natural processes than of human activity.

　　我选的是第一句是一个变化的原因在文中后边要探讨，第二个是一个evidence支持作者结论。